Current:Home > StocksPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -WealthX
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
View
Date:2025-04-27 11:47:25
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at [email protected]
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Sundance returns in-person to Park City — with more submissions than ever
- 5 takeaways from the Oscar nominations
- 'Star Trek: Picard' soars by embracing the legacy of 'The Next Generation'
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Sundance returns in-person to Park City — with more submissions than ever
- 'The Coldest Case' is Serial's latest podcast on murder and memory
- Roald Dahl's publisher responds to backlash by keeping 'classic' texts in print
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Oscar nominee Stephanie Hsu is everywhere, all at once
Ranking
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- 2023 Oscars Guide: Documentary Feature
- Curls and courage with Michaela Angela Davis and Rep. Cori Bush
- Restrictions On Drag Shows Have A History In The U.S.
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- The lessons of Wayne Shorter, engine of imagination
- Michelle Yeoh's moment is long overdue
- Halyna Hutchins' Ukrainian relatives sue Alec Baldwin over her death on 'Rust' set
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Viola Davis achieves EGOT status with Grammy win
What's making us happy: A guide to your weekend reading, listening and viewing
Actress Annie Wersching passes away from cancer at 45
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Why 'Everything Everywhere All At Once' feels more like reality than movie magic
'Camera Man' unspools the colorful life of silent film star Buster Keaton
More timeless than trendy, Sir David Chipperfield wins the 2023 Pritzker Prize